Eyeing an M&A Rebound
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- covid-19
- farm to market
As the Coronavirus pandemic spread globally and financial markets were impacted, we saw unprecedented disruption in M&A activity, and the Food, Consumer and Retail space was no exception, but as we look to the second half of 2020, deal-making may return faster than expected.
Shelter-in-place restrictions saw most businesses shelve growth plans, and focus on their balance sheets and conservation of capital. As companies faced disruptions across their business activities, from supply-chain and sourcing to office shutdowns, valuations fell and both buyers and sellers became reluctant to execute on growth or exit strategies. With concerns about accessing capital markets, we saw increases in draw-downs on revolvers.
This was especially clear during the week of April 17, when there were no deals announced were over $1 billion, something not seen in over more than 15 years.
To be sure, until there is more clarity around the severity and length of the COVID impact, it will be difficult to envision large, transformative M&A transactions.
Some transactions are still being completed, especially between companies in the same sector and in already-advanced discussions. Among recent transactions that we advised on were CD&R’s acquisition of Radio Systems, announced in May, and Rise Baking Company’s agreement in March to acquire the North American frozen manufacturing business of Dawn Foods.
New Environment
We are clearly in a new and evolving environment for deal-making.
Operational uncertainty means buyers are refocusing due diligence of targets to take a harder look at supply-chain risks and exposure to customers in highly infected buyers’ regions. Sellers will need to be more flexible on purchase price adjustment mechanisms, given the potential for deterioration in the business.
With offices and factories in lockdown and amid significant travel restrictions, due diligence is hampered by the difficulty of conducting in-person management presentations, although that’s been partially offset by virtual meetings and video conferencing.
Valuations are challenging. While deals are typically valued based on multiples of revenue or EBITDA, in a COVID-19 world, sellers of public companies will seek higher purchase-price premiums and argue that the fundamentals of their business have not changed.
Figure – comparison of purchase price premiums during periods of distressed markets or high volatility to regular markets.
In the FCR space, history has shown that consumer staples show the highest delta - oftentimes achieving the highest premiums - during distressed markets.
Stock-for Stock Deals
Trends that are developing include an increase in equity as a percentage of purchase prices, and we expect an uptick in all-stock transactions in 2020 to drive public-to-public, and public-to-private M&A.
In the near term, we expect a further increase in buyers’ use of protection clauses that afford them the option of walking away from M&A agreements if conditions materially worsen. We are already seeing examples of this, like the Sycamore/Victoria’s Secret deal that was recently terminated without either party paying a fee to the other side.
In FCR, we are seeing a fairly wide variance in trends emerge across sub-sectors, depending on the discretionary/non-discretionary nature of the business. The food distribution and food retail subsectors have remained resilient, despite an overall negative downturn across the sector.
Reasons for Optimism
While an M&A rebound tends to normally lag recovery from an economic crisis by two to four quarters, there are reasons we could see deal-making recover more quickly than in previous downturns, and rebound more in line with equity and debt markets.
With record levels of dry powder, we expect sponsors to lead the market upward as they take advantage of low valuations, leading to an uptick in take-private activity; sponsors will likely focus efforts on their portfolio companies and add-ons as a first priority.
In contrast with the last economic crisis, when Private Equity was poorly capitalized and credit markets were frozen, sponsors are much stronger this time around. From our active discussions with PE clients, we know their appetite to acquire is high, given ample supply of unspent equity, and, as debt markets continue to return to normal, we expect them to be more active.
As the economic downturn continues, so too will the frequency of distressed situations, creating opportunities for well-positioned activists and hedge funds to increase ownership in companies they already own, and look to influence business decisions.
Market dislocation will drive an uptick in public M&A from well-capitalized buyers, and we anticipate an increase in unsolicited and hostile activity.
Defense Versus Offense
Similar to the 2008 crisis and the preceding tech bubble, there’s already been a dramatic increase in shareholder rights plans, known as poison pills, and we recommend that corporations prepare themselves as they think about their own strategic alternatives, from a defensive as well as an offensive perspective.
When activism is on the rise, corporations should be engaging with their shareholders, and revisiting shareholder rights plans would also be prudent. Balance sheets should be analyzed for optimal capital structure, and companies struggling with liquidity concerns should be open-minded to conversations around strategic investments.
Companies that have the benefit of liquidity should preserve it, but remain vigilant for the right moment to make add-on acquisitions.
We are going through difficult times, but for many businesses, the fundamentals have not changed and there are good values to be had. Businesses should continue to evaluate ongoing options and assess opportunities. Now may be a good time to revisit discussions that were had in the past as some sellers face liquidity constraints and are more open to an approach.
As consumers gradually shift to more normal purchase behaviour, sellers will have greater conviction when estimating their future performance, and buyers will be more inclined to bid for the future with this added credibility.
Lyle Wilpon
Head of the Global Advisory Business for BMO Capital Markets. In this role, he is responsible for overseeing BMO’s Global Mergers & Acquisitions Group, as well as the A&D and Real Estate Brokerage businesses.
View Full Profile
As the Coronavirus pandemic spread globally and financial markets were impacted, we saw unprecedented disruption in M&A activity, and the Food, Consumer and Retail space was no exception, but as we look to the second half of 2020, deal-making may return faster than expected.
Shelter-in-place restrictions saw most businesses shelve growth plans, and focus on their balance sheets and conservation of capital. As companies faced disruptions across their business activities, from supply-chain and sourcing to office shutdowns, valuations fell and both buyers and sellers became reluctant to execute on growth or exit strategies. With concerns about accessing capital markets, we saw increases in draw-downs on revolvers.
This was especially clear during the week of April 17, when there were no deals announced were over $1 billion, something not seen in over more than 15 years.
To be sure, until there is more clarity around the severity and length of the COVID impact, it will be difficult to envision large, transformative M&A transactions.
Some transactions are still being completed, especially between companies in the same sector and in already-advanced discussions. Among recent transactions that we advised on were CD&R’s acquisition of Radio Systems, announced in May, and Rise Baking Company’s agreement in March to acquire the North American frozen manufacturing business of Dawn Foods.
New Environment
We are clearly in a new and evolving environment for deal-making.
Operational uncertainty means buyers are refocusing due diligence of targets to take a harder look at supply-chain risks and exposure to customers in highly infected buyers’ regions. Sellers will need to be more flexible on purchase price adjustment mechanisms, given the potential for deterioration in the business.
With offices and factories in lockdown and amid significant travel restrictions, due diligence is hampered by the difficulty of conducting in-person management presentations, although that’s been partially offset by virtual meetings and video conferencing.
Valuations are challenging. While deals are typically valued based on multiples of revenue or EBITDA, in a COVID-19 world, sellers of public companies will seek higher purchase-price premiums and argue that the fundamentals of their business have not changed.
Figure – comparison of purchase price premiums during periods of distressed markets or high volatility to regular markets.
In the FCR space, history has shown that consumer staples show the highest delta - oftentimes achieving the highest premiums - during distressed markets.
Stock-for Stock Deals
Trends that are developing include an increase in equity as a percentage of purchase prices, and we expect an uptick in all-stock transactions in 2020 to drive public-to-public, and public-to-private M&A.
In the near term, we expect a further increase in buyers’ use of protection clauses that afford them the option of walking away from M&A agreements if conditions materially worsen. We are already seeing examples of this, like the Sycamore/Victoria’s Secret deal that was recently terminated without either party paying a fee to the other side.
In FCR, we are seeing a fairly wide variance in trends emerge across sub-sectors, depending on the discretionary/non-discretionary nature of the business. The food distribution and food retail subsectors have remained resilient, despite an overall negative downturn across the sector.
Reasons for Optimism
While an M&A rebound tends to normally lag recovery from an economic crisis by two to four quarters, there are reasons we could see deal-making recover more quickly than in previous downturns, and rebound more in line with equity and debt markets.
With record levels of dry powder, we expect sponsors to lead the market upward as they take advantage of low valuations, leading to an uptick in take-private activity; sponsors will likely focus efforts on their portfolio companies and add-ons as a first priority.
In contrast with the last economic crisis, when Private Equity was poorly capitalized and credit markets were frozen, sponsors are much stronger this time around. From our active discussions with PE clients, we know their appetite to acquire is high, given ample supply of unspent equity, and, as debt markets continue to return to normal, we expect them to be more active.
As the economic downturn continues, so too will the frequency of distressed situations, creating opportunities for well-positioned activists and hedge funds to increase ownership in companies they already own, and look to influence business decisions.
Market dislocation will drive an uptick in public M&A from well-capitalized buyers, and we anticipate an increase in unsolicited and hostile activity.
Defense Versus Offense
Similar to the 2008 crisis and the preceding tech bubble, there’s already been a dramatic increase in shareholder rights plans, known as poison pills, and we recommend that corporations prepare themselves as they think about their own strategic alternatives, from a defensive as well as an offensive perspective.
When activism is on the rise, corporations should be engaging with their shareholders, and revisiting shareholder rights plans would also be prudent. Balance sheets should be analyzed for optimal capital structure, and companies struggling with liquidity concerns should be open-minded to conversations around strategic investments.
Companies that have the benefit of liquidity should preserve it, but remain vigilant for the right moment to make add-on acquisitions.
We are going through difficult times, but for many businesses, the fundamentals have not changed and there are good values to be had. Businesses should continue to evaluate ongoing options and assess opportunities. Now may be a good time to revisit discussions that were had in the past as some sellers face liquidity constraints and are more open to an approach.
As consumers gradually shift to more normal purchase behaviour, sellers will have greater conviction when estimating their future performance, and buyers will be more inclined to bid for the future with this added credibility.
More Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience.
Commercial
Commercial
-
Who We Are
-
Industry Expertise
- Agribusiness & Protein
- Agriculture
- Dealer Finance
- Commercial Real Estate
- Correspondent Banking
- Educational Institutions
- Engineering & Construction
- Food & Beverage
- Franchise Finance
- Futures & Securities
- Governments
- Healthcare
- Manufacturing
- Metals
- Not-for-Profit Organizations
- Private Equity Sponsors
- Professional Services
- Retail & Wholesale Distribution
- Specialty Finance
- Trucking
- Dental Practices
- Fuel Services & Convenience
- Logistics, Rail and Shipping
- Technology & Innovation
- Wine & Spirits
- Religious Institution Banking
- We Can Help
-
Our Bankers
- Our Podcasts
Contact Us
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Sponsor Finance is a trade name used by BMO Financial Corp. and its affiliates.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements.
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c, and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S., and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. This information cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. This information is being used to support the promotion or marketing of the planning strategies discussed herein. BMO Bank N.A. and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Notice to Customers
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law (USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107 56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. When you open an account, we will ask for your name, address, date of birth and other information that will allow us to identify you. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your driver's license or other identifying documents. For each business or entity that opens an account, we will ask for your name, address and other information that will allow us to identify the entity. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your certificate of incorporation (or similar document) or other identifying documents. The information you provide in this form may be used to perform a credit check and verify your identity by using internal sources and third-party vendors. If the requested information is not provided within 30 calendar days, the account will be subject to closure.